Features of Diglossic Stability in Arabic with Counterexamples
الكلمات المفتاحية:
Diglossia، Classical Arabic، Modern Standard Arabic، Religio-Linguistic Ideologyالملخص
Arabic, as a macrolanguage, represents the quintessential example of classical diglossia and remains one of the most extensively studied and well-documented cases of this linguistic phenomenon. The spoken and written varieties of Arabic have diverged over such a long period that some scholars have suggested that Arabic diglossia may have existed even before the advent of Islam. Regardless of its historical origins, various social and cultural factors have sustained Classical Arabic and Modern Standard Arabic as the prestigious language varieties. Above all, the primary force preserving this linguistic continuity for centuries has been the religio-linguistic ideology associated with Islam. This paper examines the sociolinguistic conditions and ideological factors that contribute to the stability of Arabic diglossia while also discussing several counterexamples that illustrate instances of diglossic shift.
المراجع
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. (2014). The Faroe Islands: Independence Dreams, Globalist Separatism and the Europeanization of Postcolonial Home Rule. Cooperation and Conflict.
Ager, Simon. (2015). Faroese (Føroyskt). Omniglot. Retrieved from http://www.omniglot.com/writing/faroese.htm
Al-Bukhari, Muhammad. (1987). Sahih al-Bukhari. Hamdaan Publications.
Bassiouney, Reem. (2009). Arabic Sociolinguistics. Oxford University Press.
Concilium. Sacrosanctum Concilium: Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy.
Dickey, Eleanor. (2014). Review. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology.
Ferguson, C. A. (1959a). The Arabic Koine. Language.
Ferguson, C. A. (1959b). Diglossia. Word.
Freeman, Andrew. (2006). Why There Is No Koiné in Sana'a, Yemen. In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XVI: Papers from the Sixteenth Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Cambridge, March 2002 (Vol. 266). John Benjamins Publishing.
Holes, Clive. (1992). Community, Dialect and Urbanization in the Arabic-Speaking Middle East. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
Holmes, Janet. (2001). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Routledge.
Hus, Jan. (1904). The Letters of John Hus. Translated by R. Martin Pope, with notes by Herbert P. Workman. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Kaye, Alan S. (2001). Diglossia: The State of the Art. International Journal of the Sociology of Language.
Knooihuizen, Remco. (2014). Variation in Faroese and the Development of a Spoken Standard: In Search of Corpus Evidence. Nordic Journal of Linguistics.
Laitin, David D. (1988). Language Games. Comparative Politics.
Lev-Wiesel, Rachel, & Al-Krenawi, Alean. (1999). Attitude towards Marriage and Marital Quality: A Comparison among Israeli Arabs Differentiated by Religion. Family Relations.
Nicolson, Adam. (2005). God's Secretaries: The Making of the King James Bible. Zondervan.
Pandharipande, Rajeshwari V. (2006). Ideology, Authority, and Language Choice. In Explorations in the Sociology of Language and Religion.
Pew Forum on Religious and Public Life. (2012). The Global Religious Landscape: A Report on the Size and Distribution of the World's Major Religious Groups as of 2010. Retrieved from http://www.pewforum.org/files/2014/01/global-religion-full.pdf
Pew Forum on Religious and Public Life. (2013). The Global Catholic Population. Retrieved from http://www.pewforum.org/2013/02/13/the-global-catholic-population/
Ramaswamy, Sumathi. (1998). Language of the People in the World of Gods: Ideologies of Tamil before the Nation. The Journal of Asian Studies.
Stadlbauer, Susanne. (2010). Language Ideologies in the Arabic Diglossia of Egypt. Colorado Research in Linguistics.
Versteegh, Kees. (2001). The Arabic Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Wiggers, Heiko. (2006). Reevaluating Diglossia: Data from Low German. ProQuest.
Wylie, Jonathan. (1987). The Faroe Islands: Interpretations of History. University Press of Kentucky.
التنزيلات
مقدم
منشور
كيفية الاقتباس
إصدار
القسم
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2026 Mark Shockle
هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Free to Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format;
- Free to Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material,
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes .
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
